We make bad decisions under pressure
Stress check, perspective count, and one rule: a high-stakes call made under pressure gets revisited when calm.
The brain runs two systems of cognition. System One is fast, automatic, and built for split-second survival judgment. System Two handles deliberate planning and calculation, but it is energy-intensive and, in Daniel Kahneman's own word, lazy.
Here is the counterintuitive part. Under stress, System Two loses its grip on the sorting job while System One keeps firing erroneous threat warnings anyway. Those are the precise conditions under which teams make their worst calls, and it is exactly when everyone feels most certain they are thinking clearly.
None of this makes emotion the enemy. Emotional responses are not the same as bias and they carry real, usable information. The better move is distributing a decision across more minds and a wider variety of perspectives, rather than trying to be purely logical alone.
What you get
- The two systems side by side, and why stress inverts which one is driving
- A three-part check: stress score, perspective count, and a revisit date
- The blind-spot argument for why a decision made alone carries irreducible risk
- Which decisions this is worth running on, and which it is not
Where should we send it?
One email with the worksheet. You can unsubscribe from anything else in one click.
On its way
Check your inbox. If it has not landed in a minute or two, look in promotions or spam, and add sam@startuppatterns.com to your contacts so the rest arrive.
Adapted from the Mindfulness chapter of The Mindful Product Company by Sam McAfee.